Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Amanda Cross: The Collected [Short] Stories



Amanda Cross is the pseudonym of Carolyn Heilbrun (1926 - 2003). Heilbrun was a professor of English at Columbia University until she retired in 1993. Throughout her career, and after her retirement, she wrote scholarly books in her field. But she had a secret sideline, she was also a mystery writer.

In 1964, she began writing mystery stories using a pseudonym. Her main character is Kate Fansler, a professor of English at a New York college, who is independently wealthy, and who becomes involved in mysteries of a literary -- and of a feminist -- nature. Some times there are murders involved, at other times she is just investigating mysterious disapperances.

There are 14 Kate Fansler novels, and 9 short stories featuring her. All of the stories are collected in The Collected Stories, as well as one extra featuring a "one off" story, to bring the number of stories in the anthology to ten. Cross began writing these stories for Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine in 1987.

In order to fully appreciate these stories, you do reallly need to know a little bit about Kate Fansler's background, or at least, the style in which Cross writes. The stories are very literary, and the characters act in ways that [probably] real life people would not act (but who knows, in today's times?)

If you are a fan of Isaac Asimov's Black Widower stories, you will probably like these. Asimov also, particularly later in the series, used the slightest of hooks on which to hang one of those stories. (I'm not damning with faint praise...they are still fun to read, but again, they are stories taht just wouldn't happen in real life. But that's why we love them!)

Tania's Nowhere - Kate Fansler's niece Leighton narrates this story, inthe manner of Watson sharing the explots of Holmes. Leighton is supposed to be in her early twenties and has the precise prose of a woman in her 60s, the only drawback on that score. However, the story itself is disapppointing - the weakest one in the collection. It has elements of one of Cross's novels, No Word From Winifred. Tania Finslip, a 62-year old happily married college professor, has disappeared, and no one can find her, until Kate figures out the mystery. I found the denoument unconvincing.

The rest of the stories are more agreeable, if not more realistic.

Once Upon A Time - A family is staying in a house for the summer in a nice, safe residential area. Four children are playing a game of badminton in the yard, when a toddler comes out of the woods and toward them, clad only in diaper and shirt. The children take the baby into the house, and the parents decide to give it to a childless couple whom they know. Twenty years later, the toddler comes to Kate Fansler to find out who her biological parents were, and why she was found in such odd circumstances.

Arrie and Jasper - Jasper is a dog, a Jack Russell terrier, and he's been kidnapped. Arrie is a twelve-year old girl who comes to Kate for help. Her sister, much older, had been a student of Kate's. Kate, who doesnt' like children, nevertheless likes Arrie, who is very mature for her age, and she visits Arrie's home to do a little investigating, because the mystery deepends, even as Jasper reappares. Eventually Kate finds out the truth.

The Disappearance of Great Aunt Flavia - Women in Amanda Cross stories do have a tendency to disappear without telling anyone where they're going, but these types of stories usually have happy endings, and so it is in this case. Aunt Flavia, who has learned that old women are really, invisible, unremarked and unnoticed by a society that cares only for the young, disappears. Where is she, and what is she doing? This story echoes one of the themes of another Kate Fansler novel, The Imperfect Spy, and perhaps even how Amanda Cross herself felt about society's appreciation for the young and unappreciation of the old.

Murder Without A Text - One of only two stories in the collection with a murder, it's another visitation on the theme that one old woman looks like another to the young. A Professor of English, who had been giving a class to ten students who disliked her and whom she disliked, is on trial for the murder of one of them. They all believe she's guilty. She proclaims her innocence. The reader wonders if Carolyn Heilbrun had had to deal with such students in her teaching days - they do seem incredibly rude, but in the 1970s, that's perhaps how students acted.

Who Shot Mrs. Byron Boyd - Two mystery writers, one a male chauvanist male and the other a feminist writer (not unlike Cross herself) are on a panel at a mystery convention. Mrs. Byron Boyd, the emcee, is shot from the crowd, and dies. Why? The motive for the murder seems to be too slight, but nevertheless it's a fun read.

The Proposition - Kate receives a letter from an old friend, who has now become a nun and lives in a convent in Texas. The convent has very few treasures, but one treasure they did have was a painting called "The Proposition." According to Cross, who got her information from Women Artists 1550-1950,

While paintings and prints showing men making indecent proposals to women were common in the Low Countries in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, a work portraying a woman who has clearly not invited such an invitation and refuses to accept ii is unique." [Readers learn such esoteric things when they read an Amanda Cross work!]


The painting has disappeared, and Kate's friend asks her to help them get it back. Kate eventually succeeds.

The George Elliot Play - Most mystery novels that deal with found plays usually deal with a Shakespeare play - finding a lost one would be worth a fortune - but Amanda Cross, ever the feminist, chooses as the engine of her story a George Elliot play. It's fun.

The Baroness - The final story in the collection, and the only on e not to feature Kate Fansler. Instead, it is a first person narrative by Anne, who has been the lifelong friend of Phyllida, a woman who is now a British peer. Phyllida summons her to England, where she tells her friend that she is the accidental possessor of a stolen painting. How can she return it to its rightful owner. A story that may - just may - have been plausible in the 80s and even 90s, but is impossible now, with the strictures of search that most plane travelers have to got through these days... still, another fun story.

In The Last Analysis (1964)
The James Joyce Murder (1967)
Poetic Justice (1970)
The Theban Mysteries (1971)
The Question of Max (1976)
Death in a Tenured Position (1981)
Sweet Death, Kind Death (1984)
No Word From Winifred (1986)
A Trap for Fools (1989)
The Players Come Again (1990)
An Imperfect Spy (1995)
The Collected Stories (1997)
The Puzzled Heart (1998)
Honest Doubt (2000)
The Edge of Doom (2002)

Thursday, January 21, 2010

TV Sacrificing Common Sense for Sex Appeal

Arrrgh!

I'm not a fan of Burn Notice...I dislike TV series where the "hero" is a fugitive, or under the thumb of some mysterious goverment agency.

Nevertheless, I occasionally watch it when nothing else is on.

So I just tuned in to the last minutes of an episode called "Lesser Evil," and Michael is trapped in a boat with an assassin, and his two friends, whose names escape me, are trying to rescue him.

The female friend, of the skeletal woman variety who doesn't look like she's got enough muscle to hold up a rifle, much less run with it, shoors Michael's "controller". Then she, and the other guy, start running for their escape vehicle.

Problem? She's wearing a white T-shirt. Easy for the camera to see, I suppose, which makes it easy for the viewer at home to see... but it would also make it easier for the Control's bodyguards to see them running through some thin woods and shoot them down!

Assassins don't wear white!

Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators


When I was a kid, mysteries were my favorite genre. I started out with the old standbys, Nancy Drew and Hardy Boys. Truth to tell, although I was a girl, I never did care for the Nancy Drew stories…there just wasn’t enough action or excitement, as compared with the Hardy Boys. However, I tired of the Hardy Boys after the first ten or so in the series as well, because they were all the same. Whatever mystery the boys’ father was working on, would invariably turn out to be the same one they were working on as well.

And now, thirty years later, I find that I can’t even read the books at all. The writing is for kids…and only for kids. (At least, as far as I’m concerned)

Mystery books for kids that I read when I was a kid, and which I still return to with enjoyment to this day are the Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators.

Let me give you a warning! The books were reissued a few years ago, simply titled The Three Investigators. Alfred Hitchcock (who died in 1980) has been completely removed from the stories, replaced by a different, fictional director, a Mr. Sebastian. Terrible, foolish, stupid idea!

The books were written in the 1960s and 1970s, so there are no cellphones and no computers. So what? They are enjoyable for what they are, and Hitchock should never have been removed. They are period pieces, but they are also masterpieces.

So if you should decide to purchase the books, make sure you get the ones that are called Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators.

The three investigators are Jupiter Jones, a very intelligent boy, a bit overweight, who used to be a child actor, Pete Crenshaw, an athletic boy who has more muscles than brains (although he is by no means stupid), and Bob Andrews, a studious boy who works in a library and is well-read, but not as brilliant as Jupiter.

The first ten or so books in the series were written by Robert Arthur and are the best. Later on in the series, a different author took over and did not have the same respect for the characters.

In any event, these books, though written for kids, are enjoyable by kids of all ages. I’ll give detailed reviews of individual books in later entries. For now, here’s a list of all the books in the series:

1. The Secret of Terror Castle
2. The Mystery of the Stuttering Parrot
3. The Mystery of the Whispering Mummy
4. The Mystery of the Green Ghost
5. The Mystery of the Vanishing Treasure
6. The Secret of Skeleton Island
7. The Mystery of the Fiery Eye
8. The Mystery of the Silver Spider
9. The Mystery of the Screaming Clock
10. The Mystery of the Moaning Cave
11. The Mystery of the Talking Skull
12. The Mystery of the Laughing Shadow
13. The Secret of the Crooked Cat
14. The Mystery of the Coughing Dragon
15. The Mystery of the Flaming Footprints
16. The Mystery of the Nervous Lion
17. The Mystery of the Singing Serpent
18. The Mystery of the Shrinking House
19. The Secret of Phantom Lake
20. The Mystery of Monster Mountain
21. The Secret of the Haunted Mirror
22. The Mystery of the Dead Man's Riddle
23. The Mystery of the Invisible Dog
24. The Mystery of Death Trap Mine
25. The Mystery of the Dancing Devil
26. The Mystery of the Headless Horse
27. The Mystery of the Magic Circle

The rest of the books are ones I have not read and cannot recommend!
28. The Mystery of the Deadly Double
29. The Mystery of the Sinister Scarecrow
30. The Secret of Shark Reef
31. The Mystery of the Scar-Faced Beggar
32. The Mystery of the Blazing Cliffs
33. The Mystery of the Purple Pirate
34. The Mystery of the Wandering Cave Man
35. The Mystery of the Kidnapped Whale
36. The Mystery of the Missing Mermaid
37. The Mystery of the Two-Toed Pigeon
38. The Mystery of the Smashing Glass
39. The Mystery of the Trail of Terror
40. The Mystery of the Rogues' Reunion
41. The Mystery of the Creep-Show Crooks
42. The Mystery of Wreckers' Rock
43. The Mystery of the Cranky Collector

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Check out Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine podcasts

I can remember reading Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine and Alfred Hitchcock’s Mystery Magazine ever since I was a little kid. Back then, they were published by Davis Publications and Eleanor Sullivan was the editor. I assume Joel Davis and Eleanor Sullivan have passed away, because now they’re published by Dell (as our Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine and Analog Science Fiction and Fact)

Their official website is: http://www.themysteryplace.com

And I suggest you go straight to this URL, which is their podcasts.

http://www.themysteryplace.com/podcasts/mystery_podcasts.aspx

The play button is a small green arrow at the bottom left of the screen.

Some of the stories are read by the author, others are enacted by professional actors (not big movie stars, obviously, but local actors).

It’s also possible to embed these podcasts in a website, so let’s try embedding Ellery Queen’s "A Lump of Sugar".




Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Mertz, Michaels and Peters


Elizabeth Peters is the pseudonym of Barbara Mertz, a real-life Egyptologist. Mertz has had two Egyptology books for the layperson released under her own name. She also writes romantic suspense novels under the pseudonym Barbara Michael. All told, over four decades, she's had over 40 books published.

As Elizabeth Peters, she has three main series: Vicky Bliss, an American art expert who lives and works in Germany; Jacqueline Kirby, a librarian; and Egyptologists Amelia Peabody and her husband, Radcliffe Emerson.

My least favorite series is the Vicky Bliss series. Although I liked the novel that introduced her, Borrower of the Night (1973), the remaining books in the series irritate me more than anything else. In Street of the Five Moons Bliss meets the charming jewel thief John Smythe, and falls in love with him, despite the fact that he's a thief. I dislike that trope, and so have never cared for these books.

Vicky Bliss
Borrower of the Night (1973)
Street of the Five Moons (1978)
Silhouette in Scarlet (1983)
Trojan Gold (1987)
Night Train to Memphis (1994)
The Laughter of Dead Kings (2008)

Jacqueline Kirby is my favorite book series now, only because I haven't cared for the later novels in the Peabody series.

The Seventh Sinner (1972)
Murders of Richard III (1974)
Die for Love (1984)
Naked Once More (1989)

The Murders of Richard III is the first Elizabeth Peters book I ever read, and my first introduction to the mystery of Richard III.

The first two...or even three...novels in the Amelia Peabody series are my absolute favorites. Loved the character. Loved the interplay between her and Radcliffe Emerson. Then, she had a child, Ramses. And soon Ramses became the focal point of the stories...or at least, the soap opera between him and their adopted daughter (would he or would he not have the guts to ask her out on a date) just really got on my nerves.)

I continue to read the books, because I continue to enjoy Amelia and Emerson, but I confess I skim through all the sections that they are not in!
Here's the Amelia Peabody series:

Crocodile on the Sandbank. 1975. (Covers the 1884–85 Season)
The Curse of the Pharaohs. 1981. (Covers the 1892–93 Season)
The Mummy Case. 1985. (Covers the 1894–95 Season)
Lion in the Valley. 1986. (Covers the 1895–96 Season)
The Deeds of the Disturber. 1988. (Covers Summer 1896)
The Last Camel Died at Noon. 1991. (Covers the 1897–98 Season)
The Snake, the Crocodile, and the Dog. 1992. (Covers the 1898–99 Season)
The Hippopotamus Pool. 1996. (Covers the 1899–1900 Season)
Seeing a Large Cat. 1997. (Covers the 1903–04 Season)
The Ape Who Guards the Balance. 1998. (Covers the 1906–07 Season)
The Falcon at the Portal. 1999. (Covers the 1911–12 Season)
He Shall Thunder in the Sky. 2000. (Covers the 1914–15 Season)
Lord of the Silent. 2001. (Covers the 1915–16 Season)
The Golden One. 2002. (Covers the 1916–17 Season)
Children of the Storm. April 2003. (Covers the 1919–20 Season)
Guardian of the Horizon. March 2004. (Covers the 1907–08 Season)
The Serpent on the Crown. March 2005. (Covers the 1922 Season)
Tomb of the Golden Bird. March 2006.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Encyclopedia Brown: a must-read for all children



Donold J. Sobol has written a series of books that every child should read.

Why? Because it teaches kids to think. It teaches them to listen to what people say and understand what they say. It teaches them to pay attention to what they see and understand what they see. It teaches kids to be able to deduce from what they see.

Each of the Encyclopedia Brown stories follow the same formula. Leroy (for such is his real name) has set up a detective agency, and his fellow kids come to him for help in all cases.

A sample case - a boy wearing a cast on his right arm is accused of stealing a knife, which is then found in his right hand back pocket. Encyclopedia points out that a kid with his right arm in a cast wouldn't be able to put a knife into his right hand back pocket.


(1) Encyclopedia Brown, Boy Detective (1963)
(2) Encyclopedia Brown Strikes Again (the Case of the Secret Pitch) (1965)
(3) Encyclopedia Brown Finds the Clues (1966)
(4) Encyclopedia Brown Gets His Man (1967)
(5) Encyclopedia Brown Solves Them All (1968)
(6) Encyclopedia Brown Keeps the Peace (1969)
(7) Encyclopedia Brown Saves the Day (1970)
(8) Encyclopedia Brown Tracks Them Down (1971)
(9) Encyclopedia Brown Shows the Way (1972)
(10) Encyclopedia Brown Takes the Case (1973)
(11) Encyclopedia Brown Lends a Hand (1974)
(12) Encyclopedia Brown and the Case of the Dead Eagles (1975)
(13) Encyclopedia Brown and the Case of the Midnight Visitor (1977)
(14) Encyclopedia Brown Carries On (1980)
(15) Encyclopedia Brown Sets the Pace (1981)

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Lousy Prose Overcome By Compelling Formula: Clive Cussler

The many books of Clive Cussler are not mystery novels, but rather techno-thrillers, nevertheless I’ll review them, and other such books here, as the spirit moves me.

Cussler’s main characters are Dirk Pitt and Al Giordano of Numa (National Underwater and Marine Agency). He’s written others, collaborating with other writers (who are even worse writers than he is) but I want to focus on the Dirk Pitt series.

It may be thought of as sour grapes for me to criticize the writing of Clive Cussler when you consider that the author has become a multi-millionaire and his books have sold over 90 million copies, nevertheless that’s what I’m going to do!

Cussler has a successful formula – which is why I like reading his books for the most part. They all start the same way. Sometime way back in history, an event occurs – a treaty is written and then lost, a tomb is found and then lost, a ship with treasure escapes its pursuers and then disappears, etc. Then, to present day (near future, though, five years or so after the year in which Cussler is actually writing the book), and some monomaniacal criminal genius is searching for this lost treasure, finds it, and can turn it to his advantage if not stopped by Dirk Pitt, Al Giordano, and the forces of Numa.

In the present day, there’s always some archaeological or research team working in the exact location where the missing item is thought to be, invariably with a beautiful woman scientist as one of the crew, and invariably another member of the team is a traitor, actually in league with the enemy.

Dirk Pitt is usually nearby, conducting some research for Numa, hears that a research group is in trouble, and goes to the rescue.

Now, it may sound like I'm making fun of the formula, and in a way I am...but it's also enjoyable. I do like reading about all the historical stuff, and how it has relevance in the modern day....

But sometimes I just have to grit my teeth at Cussler’s prose. I think how much better his books would be if he was a bit of a better writer.

Consider this passage from Flood Tide (1997:

The chilling fingers of revulsion touched the back of Pitt’s neck as he saw a number of women and several children scattered among the sunken field of the dead. Many of them were elderly. The icy, fresh water running down from the glaciers had maintained the bodies in a state of near-perfect preservation. They appeared to be lying peacefully, as if asleep, slightly indented in the soft silt. On some the facial expressions were tranquil, on others the eyes bulged and the mouths were thrust open in what was their final scream. They lay undisturbed, unaffected by the frigid water temperature and the daily sequences of light and dark. There was no sign of decay.

As the submersible passed directly within one meter of what looked like an entire family, he could see by the folds of the eyes and features of the faces that they were Oriental. He could also see that their hands were tied behind them, their mouths taped and their feet roped to iron weights.

So, what’s wrong with those paragraphs? Well, first of all, he’s right about one thing. Fresh, cold water will preserve the flesh on the bones of corpses…if there are no fish in the lake to eat them, they will look undisturbed. (I learned that from Nevada Barr's A Superior Death!)

But what about the rest of it?

The chilling fingers of revulsion touched the back of Pitt’s neck as he saw a number of women and several children scattered among the sunken field of the dead. Many of them were elderly. (Many of the children were elderly?)

The icy, fresh water running down from the glaciers had maintained the bodies in a state of near-perfect preservation. They appeared to be lying peacefully, as if asleep, slightly indented in the soft silt. (No. If they are tied to weights, as Cussler states later on, their bodies will continue to float – they won’t lie on the lake bed!)

On some the facial expressions were tranquil, on others the eyes bulged and the mouths were thrust open in what was their final scream. They lay undisturbed, unaffected by the frigid water temperature and the daily sequences of light and dark. There was no sign of decay. (Isn’t that what “in a state of near-perfect preservation” means?)

As the submersible passed directly within one meter of what looked like an entire family, he could see by the folds of the eyes and features of the faces that they were Oriental. He could also see that their hands were tied behind them, their mouths taped and their feet roped to iron weights. (directly seems kind of superfluous). (If their mouths are taped, how can some of them have mouths “thrust open” in what was their final scream?)

That type of prose is used in all the books.

Cussler does try for "strong" women characters in his books, but fails. On one occasion, Dirk's main squeeze (when he isn't squeezing someone else) is a congresswoman, who allows herself to be blackmailed rather than have compromising photos of her and Dirk published. This woman has known Dirk for how many years? Obviously, all she has to do is tell Dirk and let him sort it out. Or better still, instead of letting herself be blackmailed, say "Publish and be damned." But instead Cussler has her knuckle under, which diminished her character for me.

My own favorite among the Pitt books is Atlantis Found, followed by Raise the Titanic. Night Probe is also enjoyable.

The book I absolutely dislike is Sahara, in which people are driven mad by drinking radium-laced water, and turn into mindless cannibals. Pitt has his revenge on the man responsible by having him drink radium laced water, so that he ends up dying the same way. But…the whole book is just way to unpleasant. [I liked the idea of a kidnapped President Lincoln... but the rest of it... ich) (And why movie makers decided to choose this particular novel of Cussler’s to adapt just makes no sense. Night Probe would have been much more fun. Or even Atlantis Found, which would have drawn lots of Atlantean enthusiasts!)


Dirk Pitt books
1. Pacific Vortex! (1983) [The first Dirk Pitt book written, unsold until after success of Raise the Titanic.]
2. The Mediterranean Caper (1973)
3. Iceberg (1975)
4. Raise the Titanic! (1976)
5. Vixen 03 (1978)
6. Night Probe! (1981)
7. Deep Six (1984)
8. Cyclops (1986)
9. Treasure (1988)
10. Dragon (1990)
11. Sahara (1992)
12. Inca Gold (1994)
13. Shock Wave (1996)
14. Flood Tide (1997)
15. Atlantis Found (1999)
16. Valhalla Rising (2001)
17. Trojan Odyssey (2003)
18. Black Wind (2004)
19. Treasure of Khan (2006)
20. Arctic Drift (2008)

Saturday, January 16, 2010

The Cat Who Went Up The Creek, by Lilian Jackson Braun

Lilian Jackson Braun is the author of 29 novels about James Qwilleran and his cats Koko and Yum-Yum. The 30th book, The Cat Who Smelled Smoke, was cancelled by the publisher in 2009.

The Cat Who… series is a popular one, and I myself like the first ten or so in the series. After that, Braun’s creative well seemed to run dry, and the remaining books were poorly done. Oh, they could pass as tales of what happens to a columnist named James Qwilleran and his two cats, Koko and Yum Yum, but as mysteries…in which Qwilleran actually does some detecting….they fail. This may be perhaps due to age... Braun was born in 1913 and is now 97...

Take for example The Cat Who Went Up The Creek, the 24th book in the series, published in 2002.

James Qwilleran, he of the bushy moustache that prickles to let him know when a newsworthy story is happening, has two cats, haughty Siamese. The male, Koko, is a detective, who helps Qwilleran solve mysteries in his own cat-like, intuitive fashion, the female, Yum-Yum, just lounges around and looks pretty.

In the first three books in the series, published in the late 1960s, Qwilleran is a reporter in Chicago. A recovering alcoholic, he is hired on a paper but, instead of becoming a crime reporter as he had been, he is assigned other jobs beneath his dignity - fashion columnist, interior decoration columnist, food columnist, etc. But each of his assignments always seem to turn up a murder...which he then solves with the aid of his cat companions. Koko comes to him in the first book, The Cat Who Could Read Backwards, and Yum-Yum joins them in the second, The Cat Who Ate Danish Modern.

The series then went on hiatus for eighteen years, until 1986. The Cat Who Saw Red takes place once again in Chicago. (Apparently her publishers felt that the public's taste during the 1970s wasn't for these "teacosy" books, but rather for the hardboiled sex and sadism school.)

It is in the next book, The Cat Who Played Brahms, that Qwilleran takes his cats "400 miles north of everywhere" to Moose County and the town seat of Pickax, to have a vacation and write a book. He is the guest of his Aunt Fanny Klingenschoen, a very wealthy woman who ends up dying. In her will, she leaves her entire fortune to Qwilleran, provided he lives in Moose County for five years.

The rest of the series, some 24 books, recount Qwilleran's adventures in Moose County. We meet an ensemble cast, the Goodwinters, the Lanspeaks, the Exbridgs, many of whom have family skeletons in their closets and murder in their hearts.

In The Cat Who Went Up The Creek, Qwilleran receives a request from an old friend. Nick and Lori Bamba run the Nutcracker Inn, located in a town called Black Creek. It's a new venture for them, but Lori feels nervous.

In the rather stilted dialog that pervades the book, Lori explains:

"Well...I always thought innkeeping would be my kind of work: meeting people, making them happy, providing a holiday atmosphere. Instead I feel gloomy."


Does anyone actually use the world gloomy to describe how they're feeling, in real life?

In any event, Qwilleran agrees to take a room at the end for a few weeks, to see if he can discern why she is feeling so depressed.

While there, he meets a lot of interesting people, whom he interviews for his book, Tall Tales of Moose County... and we the reader are treated to those interviews -- for sheer padding purposes. A character writes a letter to the local newspaper -- we're treated to the full text of that as well.

Qwilleran does no detecting in the book, he simply talks to some people. A few people die, but this doesn't interest Qwilleran enough to do any actual detecting..and indeed, at the end of the book, although we know who the criminal is, we don't know if he ever gets caught!

Fans of the series who know and like Qwilleran will perhaps not be upset by the lack of detection in the book, they will like these little capsule interviews and claim that they add verisimiltude and je ne sais quois to the series.

But to those who want a real mystery, this disappoints.

Subsequent books are little better, and most of them are even worse. The padding becomes more obvious, the writing more stilted and the scenes are sketched out rather than described fully. They are outlines of books, skeletons, with very little flesh on the bones. Also, the same old tried-and-true methods are repeated - a mysterious person comes to Pickax or Moose County, is not what they seem, and ends up getting murdered. The home they occupy burns down, more often than not, and so on.

Now, I do recommend Braun’s earliest books in the series. The first four books in particular are quite good. The Pickax books are acceptable, up unti about The Cat Who Blew The Whistle. After that, I can’t recommend them at all…if you’re a completist who wants to read every book in the series, check the rest of them out from the library.

1. The Cat Who Could Read Backwards (1966)
2. The Cat Who Ate Danish Modern (1967)
3. The Cat Who Turned On and Off (1968)
4. The Cat Who Saw Red (1986)
5. The Cat Who Played Brahms (1987)
6. The Cat Who Played Post Office (1987)
7. The Cat Who Knew Shakespeare (1988)
8. The Cat Who Sniffed Glue (1988)
9. The Cat Who Went Underground (1989)
10. The Cat Who Talked to Ghosts (1990)
11. The Cat Who Lived High (1990)
12. The Cat Who Knew a Cardinal (1991)
13. The Cat Who Moved a Mountain (1992)
14. The Cat Who Wasn't There (1992)
15. The Cat Who Went into the Closet (1993)
16. The Cat Who Came to Breakfast (1994)
17. The Cat Who Blew the Whistle (1995)
18. The Cat Who Said Cheese (1996)
19. The Cat Who Tailed a Thief (1997)
20. The Cat Who Sang for the Birds (1999)
21. The Cat Who Saw Stars (1999)
22. The Cat Who Robbed a Bank (2000)
23. The Cat Who Smelled a Rat (2001)
24. The Cat Who Went up the Creek (2002)
25. The Cat Who Brought Down the House (2003)
26. The Cat Who Talked Turkey (2004)
27. The Cat Who Went Bananas (2005)
28. The Cat Who Dropped a Bombshell (2006)
29. The Cat Who Had 60 Whiskers (2007)

Friday, January 15, 2010

Where is the 2010 Cagney and Lacey?

I suppose I should preface my rant by saying that I don't watch a lot of first run TV... it's so hard to find first run TV these days because most of the shows are reality series crap, interspersed with a fiction show once in a while.

But, what crime shows today star women?

There are 3, if memory serves. Bones, which I like for the most part, although the amorous adventures of Angela the forensic artist getting on my nerves. I like Cam the Head of the Forensic Division though. But in any event, this is an ensemble cast.

I never watch Saving Grace, I dont like such severely flawed heros (I hate people who are so stupid as to become alcoholics, especially if they are supposed to be police officers), but according to Wikipedia its another ensemble show. (It also has apparently been canceled, even though it got high ratings in the US, because overseas sales of DVDs were disappointing. Not sure if that shows good taste on the part of foreigners -- they don't like hard-drinking promiscuous women cops -- or if it just shows them to be chauvanistic and they dont' like women of any kind...)

And The Closer, another ensemble show. The lead character, Deputy Chief Brenda Johnson, is definitely in charge of her people, but still, it's an ensemble show.

And that's it.

Now, where are the shows where it's just a woman or two women, doing their job?

THere are plenty of "retreads" of TV shows. For example White Collar is a version of It Takes A Thief. Two guys, the con man soooo sexy and appealing to women, and his FBI minder. Why couldn't that have been a con woman and her FBI minder, also a women. Women can't be reformed conwomen? Of course I despise these types of shows (all excep the original - I loved It Takes A Thief!) As if some dishonest thief can do better than a stand up law enforcement officer when it comes down to foiling the bad guys.

What about shows for kids?

We've got The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron, Boy Genius. Based on the movie of course, which has the obnoxious girl, kind of like Lucy Van Pelt from the Peanuts Cartoons. Dora the Explorer is I think the only female character who has her own TV show. Everything else has a boy lead. (So it was kind of funny that, a couple of days ago, they did an episode of Arthur where Arthur, the boy, was concerned about and obsessing over his weight, whereas DJ, his annoying sister, wasn't. Never mind the fact that Arthur has always been a slender... ardvark, not in the least overweight. But however old he is, and however old his audience is, of course they must start becoming obsessed with their weight even earlier than they usually do!)

I rant quite a bit about the status of women in US society these days, how we are more free now than ever before to do anything we want - invent, explore, be a scientist, and so on, and yet more and more women just settle for marriage and kids...and increasingly....just kids....with no education, no desire to be the best they can be... indeed, any show on TV that features a woman character these days invariably seems to have a young woman with a kid and no dad in the picture... that's what they did with the Bionic Woman if memory serves...it wasn't her kid but her young sister who was a pain...and the lead character wasn't some scientist or adventurer like a skydiver, as the original had been, but rather a waitress. A waitress.

No, I'm not "dissing" waitresses...except in so much that waitressing should be a job one takes while one goes to college, so one can then move on to getting a better job and a career...or if one chooses only the career of raising ones kids, one can raise them with knowledge of one's own to earn some respect from the little rug rats.

There's a TV series called Burn Notice, which co-starrs Sharon Gless as the lead character's mother. Gless has put on quite a bit of weight since her Cagney and Lacy days, a circumstance that I do not care about at all, after all it has been 20 years, and the same thing happens to guys...pace William Shatner and his spare tire in TJ Hooker and his spare tires in Boston Legal! And Tyne Daly also is showing her age - I think both these women are in their 60s now. And all I have to say is, MORE POWER TO THEM!

But they are being reunited on an episode of Burn Notice, and it will be interesting to see what the plot is. Normally I don't watch Burn Notice, but I'm going to try to make an effort to catch this episode.

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Visit the Agatha Christie official website

http://www.agathachristie.com/

The website has a biography of Christie, a Christie timeline, information on her detectives, blogs from fans - a few that have not been updated in a while, however, and a section called Christie Talk - fan forums, from her romances to her plays to her detective novels.

There are even free games like a Christie soduku, which one can play there, a "Trump the Murderer Game" and weekly quizzes.

This same page also has role playing PC games which one must purchase - each based on Christie novels.

The header of the website features a photo of Geraldine McEwen's Miss Marple, which I think is unfortunate. Much as I like this actress's work, her Miss Marple series was horrible. The stories bore no resemblance to their source material. David Suchet's Poirot is also featured, that's okay, and the two actors who played Tommy and Tuppence Beresford. I never did care for their portrayal of the two...but then, that's just me.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Sherlock Holmes or Sherlock Bond?

I saw Sherlock Holmes a couple of days ago. The movie starts a "ripped" Robert Downey Jr. as Sherlock Holmes (although in these days of digital jiggery-pokery, it's difficult to say whether he does have such a good body or if the moviemakers did a little CGI improvement. He did show off the same body in Iron Man, admittedly).

Jude Law plays Dr. Watson, who after several years as a roommate of Holmes, is getting married to a woman named Mary Morstan (not the Mary Morstan of "The Speckled Band", however, as this Mary doesn't meet Holmes until Watson introduces them at a restaurant). Holmes is not happy about this, and tries to persuade Watson to stay. (Some people say this is evidence of a homosexual bond between Holmes and Watson, and that's probably the way Ritchie meant it, but if you go by the source material - i.e. Doyle's works, it simply means that Holmes has found Watson an ideal partner, a "tool" who aids him in his cases, and doesn't want to lose that. As well as being a friend.) So people who want to think Holmes and Watson are bisexual can do so, and those who believe he is a-sexual with a prediliction for women (which is the Holmes of the stories) can do so as well.

Because Watson is moving out of Baker Street to get married and form his own establishment with his wife.

Of course that's just a minor sub plot. The main plot is that a Lord Blackwood, who is apparently a Satanist, has been catpured and is to be hung, but he promises to come back from the grave.

To be honest, I'm not sure if I like this movie or not. Holmes and Watson are certainly "action heroes" - everything is solved by violence rather than ratiocination - although Holmes does do a lot of that as well...

But they do have to diminish Holmes a bit (and I'm not talking about the gay subtext). The trailers shown on TV show Holmes tied to a bed, naked, with only a strategically placed pillow between himself and complete embarrassment. In the movie, itself, there is absolutely no reason for this. A certain person knocks him unconscious and makes her escape...and yet deliberately strips him named and ties him to a bed before she does so? Why? It seems the scene was put in there simply so that it could be shown in the trailers to give people a good laugh...putting Holmes on the same level as other individuals who go to a woman for sex, and are tricked out of their money and then left in an embarrasing position. Well... Holmes had not gone to this certain individual's room for sex... (oh, why be coy, I'm talking about the woman, Irene Adler!) but to help her, and, again, for her to strip him naked and leave for a chambermaid to find just seems unneccesarily cruel and out of character for her.

But it gets a good laugh.

I have therefore decided to like the movie, by thinking in my mind that it's just an "alternate universe" Holmes and Watson... just as that Star Trek movie was an "alternate universe" Star Trek...

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

The Secret Adversary, by Agatha Christie

There are many "firsts" in my life that I don't remember. I have always regretted not keeping a journal from the time I was young, keeping track of the first time I met people, the first time I read this book or saw that movie, first time I got a job, and so on.

There are two firsts that I do remember.

The very first play I ever saw was Agatha Christie's The Mousetrap. I was about 11 years old. It was 1971, and there was a draught in Zambia or some other African country. The cargo firm for which my father worked was hired to fly food from Botswana to Zamia. THe job was to last for at least a year. My dad decided to take advantage of the tax breaks offered to those whose whole families lived overseas for a year, so he took my mom and two siblings with him, and we moved to Johannesburg, South Africa. The flight took us via London, England, and while there, we went to see The Mousetrap. First play, first mystery play, first crush on an actor. (I liked the guy who played Detective Sargeant Trotter.)

In Johannesburg, we rented a furnished house from a couple, and on their bookshelves was The Secret Adversary. I might not have picked it up if I'd never seen The Mousetrap, but I was familiar with the name Agatha Christie, so I did, and loved it. It was the first "grown up" book I ever read, the first "grown up" mystery, and the first book of Agatha Christie's that I ever read.

I have been a fan of Agatha Christie's ever since. Of course, even though there's a special place in my heart for Christie, I am not blind to her faults. And I don't care for the last few books she wrote, they definitely suffer in quality. But when she was in her prime....

Agatha Christie's books can be divided into two main sections - her detective novels, featuring Hercule Poirot or Miss Marple, and her adventure thrillers, featuring, usually, independent heroines or young couples.

The Secret Adversary, published in 1922, was Christie's second book published, after The Mysterious Affair at Styles, which was a detective story featuring Hercule Poirot.

Tommy Beresford served in the Army and was demobbed (demobilized) with few prospects. Tuppence Beresford served as a nurse during the war, and is also at a loose end. They meet accidently, rekindle their friendship, and discuss their difficulties in finding work. They decide to form their own business - Young Adventurers Ltd, and put an ad in the newspaper seeking informaton on someone called Jane Finn. Tuppence had overhead two other people talking about someone with that name, and wondering where she was. So she and Tommy decide to be proactive in what they hope will be their first case.

But they get more than they bargain for. Jane Finn disappeared after the sinking of the Lusitania, entrusted with a treaty that at the time - during WWI - made since, but now if its terms were known could cause another war, but not with Germany, and the British government and various nefarious parties have been searching for her, and that treaty, ever since.

The Secret Adversary is, to put it plainly, just a lot of fun. It's hardly dated at all, for all that' its over 80 years old. Secret treaties with terms that can backfire are certainly plausible, the characters are engaging, and the mystery fast moving. There are of course no computers, no cellphones, no TVs, in that it's a simpler time.

That's another reason why I like to read these early books of Agatha Christie. The author is at the height of her powers, but we also get insights into how people lived (at least, a certain social segment of it) way back in the 1920s.

Christie used the Tommy and Tuppence characters several more times. I also recommend Partners in Crime, which is an anthology of short stories, in which Tommy, with Tuppence's assistance, solves various mysteries using methods of other top detectives of the day (the 1920s day) such as Holmes, Reggie Fortune, the Thinkng Machine, and so on. N or M, which takes place during World War II, is also well done.

After that, the series falls off, in my opinion. Unlike Poiror and Miss Marple, who never age in the 60 years of their existence, Tommy and Tuppence do, and by By the Pricking of My Thumbs (written 20 years after N or M?) they are old, Tuppence is matronly, and the fun has rather gone out of the series.

But, they had a good run.

As for purchasing details, the book is still in print and can be purchased via Amazon.com if not in your local bookstore. If Amazon.com is to be believed, you can also get it for free from Kindle.

Monday, January 11, 2010

The James Joyce Murder, by Amanda Cross

The James Joyce Murder (1967) is the second of fourteen Kate Fansler mysteries, a series that began in 1964 with In the Last Analysis, and ended in 2002 with The Edge of Doom.

Kate Fansler is a professor of English literature at an unnamed New York college, who at the time of The James Joyce Murder, is dating a district attorney, Reed Amhearst. She is tall, soigne, and independently wealthy, with three brothers with whom she does not get along, as she is a feminist and they have old-fashioned views about women's place in the home.

At the beginning of The James Joyce Murder, Reed, who has been out of the country on business, tracks Kate down at a house in the country. She is fulfilling the wishes of the daughter of a recently deceased friend, who was a publishing giant back in the days of such famous writers as James Joyce. She is to go through a vast array of papers and decide which academic institutions should get which papers.


Also resident in the house is her young nephew, foisted upon her for the summer by one of her brothers. In order to take care of her nephew, Kate hires a tutor, William Lenehan, and another young man, Emmet Crawford, to help her sort through the papers.

Reed decides to stick around for a week or so, and at the same time, Kate has two visitors from New York, an aged female professor friend, and a younger female professor friend who is also in love with Emmet Crawford...who just happens to be celibate.

But this isn't a soap opera. Next door to the house is a farm, inhabited by an extremely irritating and noisy neighbor who is intent on causing trouble for everybody. Each morning, Wiliam and Leo practice shooting - with an empty rifle - at this neighbor, just for fun. Except one morning, someone has put a bullet into the rifle, and William's aim is true. The neighbor dies.

Was it a practical joke gone wrong, or did someone hope to murder the woman by proxy? That is what Kate Fansler and Reed Amhearst have to find out.

Mary Bradford - the murdered woman - has a lot of enemies, and Kate's task is by no means an easy one.

I am a fan of the books of Amanda Cross (although I believe her early books are much better than her later ones, which are more like feminist tracks with the mystery grafted on) but her works do have limitations. They are puzzles. Character development is non-existant. The books are very wordy...there can be three pages of dialog, and all her characters do tend to sound alike. I'm not saying that you get confused by who is saying what - she's an expert writer and identifies each speaker...but she has to do this, otherwise you just wouldn't know!

Cross writes intellectual puzzles, and this one is quite enjoyable.

Here's a few paragraphs:

"Do you think Mr. Bradford would mind our intruding on him, especially today?"

"He's rather patient about it, actually. It seems to me Leo and William used to spend every afternoon down there at milking time, till they knew more about it than he did. Anyway, maybe we ought to be detecives and see how he's reacting. Shall we go? Across the fields, or down the road?"

"The road, I think," Grace said. "I understand how to cope with cars better than those dangers I know not of. With which, icidentally, the rural life seems to be replete. I have known many raging passions in my time, from naked ambition to naked lust, but no one has ended shooting anyone else, though a few to be sure have endfed their own lives. I blame it not on the greater inherent violence of rural life, but on the greater familiarity with guns and violent death. I expect after you have many times seen a deer or woodchuck blown to bits, the thought of a human being blown to bits is that much less impossible to conceive."

"Bradford once told me," Kate sai, "that there are no thefts around here precisely because everyone knpws that everyone has a gun, knows how to use it, and will use it."

"It does then, doesn't it," Grace asked, "sound rather as though someone would be likelier to grab a gun and shoot Mary Bradford out of sheer annoyance, rather than slip a bullet into someone else's gun? I mean, do you think this really sounds like a rural crime? It seems to me more the crime of a metaphoric mind."

"A Joycean mind?, you mean" Lina asked.

"Literary, anyway.""I don't follow that," said Kate. "It seems to me some rural type who hated her saw the chance of getting rid of her and took it. The fact that it would be involving a pack of nuts from the city in a hell of a lot of trouble simply added to the attraction of the method. Here comes a car."

The three of them stepped to the side of the road as the car, driven too fast by the inevitable adolescent mail, slowed only enough to permit the yelling back of some invitation seething with sarcasm. As the three of them returned to the road, Grace chuckled.

"Now in a piece of mystery fiction, that car would contain not howling adolescents, but adventure. Do you ready mystery stories?"

"Certainly," Kate said.


If you like literate and intelligent mysteries, you'll enjoy the Kate Fansler series. Give this one a try.

Burn Me Deadly, by Alex Bledsoe

Burn Me Deadly is the second book to feature the hard-boiled detective Eddie Lacrosse, who exists in a world where magic is real, and so is murder.

The first book in the series is The Sword-Edged Blonde, which I haven't read, but while in some book series it increases your enjoyment if you read them in chronological order, I don't think that is the case with Burn Me Deadly. It stands on its own.

Burn Me Deadly is an unusual title for a heroic fantasy novel, you're perhaps saying to yourself. Actually, the title, and indeed the book itself, is an homage to a classic 1950s film noir, Kiss Me Deadly, a movie which starred Ralph Meeker as Mike Hammer, the detective of Mickey Spillane.

The Ralph Meeker film opens with Mike Hammer driving down a deserted country road. Suddenly a woman runs out in front of him, begging for help. Mike agrees to give her a lift to the nearest town, and points out that he's a private detective and can help her. She doesn't think he can..and indeed, a few minutes later another car runs him off the road. Mike is knocked unconscious, the girl is kidnapped, and later on is found murdered, after having been tortued, apparently in an attempt to make her reveal information -- which she does not do before her death. Mike Hammer vows to find out who is responsible for her death, and what she knew that was work killing for.

If you know the Meeker film, you know what that is...if you don't know what it is, I'm not going to tell you. It won't spoil Burn Me Deadly for you if you know, indeed it might even heighten your enjoyment of the book, as you wonder what it is author Bledsoe can use in a fantasy-world setting to match what the "secret" is in the 1950s film noir.

I enjoyed Burn Me Deadly for the most part. I liked the parallels with the movie - indeed, that's why I bought the book, to see what those parallels would be, and if the author could pull them off.

What I didn't like about the book is the "voice" that is used. The action takes place in a heroic-fantasy world, with knights, and kings and queens, and peasants...and other things, and yet every character talks as if he lives in New York in the 20th century. It's very disconcerting...almost as disconcerting as the aliens in the movie Planet 51 being so much like earth in the 1970s, complete with stoned rock guitarists and peace protesters!

It wouldn't have been necessary to use the overly poetic voice that sword & sorcery books like The Lord of the Rings used, of course, but some kind of acknowledgement that the characters were in a medievel world would have been nice.

Of course, by using the voice he does, Bledsoe is able to inject some subtle humor into the book.

There's also a tense mystery, appealing characters - for all his hard-boiledness, LaCrosse is a film noir hero after all - he's got his code, which he adheres to. Of course, since it's a modern-day book, his side-kick is an independent woman who can hold her own in a sword fight, unlike the old-fashioned heroines who merely cower in corners while the detective and villalin duke it out with her as the prize... but I have no problem with that.

Here's a couple of paragraphs from the book:

The next day I left the hospital. My ribs had pretty much healed, and the huge bandage around my head had diminished to a single circlet mainly protecting the thick scab under my hair. Mother Bennings said it could go, too, whenever I felt like it. My head still hurt and my side ached, but I could rest at home just as well. Besides, those blank white walls were starting to get to me.

My belongings, including my Jackblade-KG model sword, were returned to me when I checked out. So the guy with the dragon boots hadn't kept it; he meant for my death to look like an accident, as if I'd simply ridden off the cliff in the darkness.I checked it over, includinbg the stiletto hidden in the hilt, but it was undamaged and had not been sabotaged. I did not buckle the scabard around my waist, it had done me no good at all the last time I'd worn it.


If you're a fan of hard-boiled mysteries, with just traces of fantasy, you'll enjoy this book.

Dial H For Hitchcock, by Susan Kandel

Dial H For Hitchcock, by Susan Kandel, is an enjoyable read, but before I get into my review, let me rant for a paragraph or two on the woes of a frustrated mystery writer! Twenty years ago, that's what I wanted to be, a mystery writer in the fashion of my favorite author, Agatha Christie.

And I even had a great idea for a plot. A group of people who wished to become members of the Delicious Death Society had to meet the entrance requirement - which was to have seen a production of every play Agatha Christie ever wrote. And as the group traveled hither and yon, eventually having to mount a production of Akhnaton themselves, they encountered mysteries and murders...which they totally ignored in favor of their on-stage mystery quest. It would have been fantastic, and hilarious...but I didn't have the staying power to write it, let alone the skill.

So imagine my annoyance and envy when, after reading Dial H For Hitchcock, I take a look at the other books in the Cece Caruso series and find that one of them is called Christietown, with the plot as follows: "A new suspense-themed housing tract on the edge of the Mojave desert is about to open. For the grand opening weekend, Cece Caruso is staging a play featuring the beloved sleuth Miss Marple. But everything goes wrong...including a leading lady who ends up dead."

Substitute my Delicious Death Society for that "suspense-themed housing tract," and this was the book I coulda/shoulda written 20 years ago! Well, I'll have to go out and acquire the copy, just to make my misery complete.

Anyway, back to the real subject of this hub, which is a review of Dial H for Hitchcock. It's brand new, the fourth book in the series, and the first book of Kandel's that I've read. I enjoyed it so much that I will be getting the remaining four...it will be interesting to read Not a Girl Detective which features the mileiu of the Nancy Drew collector. (I always preferred the Hardy Boys myself, although my absolute favorite children/teens mystery series is the original Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators series.)

Cece Caruso, "mystery biographer extraordinaire, vintage clothing enthusiast, and part time sleuth" goes to see a movie, carrying a purse with a clasp doesn't close all the way. Ths allows a cell phone to fall into the bag, unnoticed by her until she returns home.

Cece finds the phone because someone calls on it, and tells her to meet him at "Beachwood Canyon," never giving Cece a chance to tell him she's not who he thinks she is. She decides to go to the rendezvous to return the phone...only to witness a man and a woman struggling on a cliff...and then the woman falling to her death.

Cece then puts her sleuthing skills into high gear, to find the identity of the murderer...but quickly descends into the nightmarish realms that HItchcock did so well...of events that happen that don't make sense, of the innocent man (or in this case, woman) suspected of a crime she did not commit, all the while also working on her biography of Alfred Hitchcock which is overdue to the publisher!

Cece Caruso is a delightful character, and her personality comes across in the first person narrative style. She's funny, she's charming, and she's got a strong sense of justice.

Here's a few paragraphs from the book:

I broke into a run, hoping I'd magically transform into a superhero by the time I got to where they were. I craned my neck upward. They were close to the edge now, still tangled in each other's arms. It was at least thirty feet down. The sound of branches cracking under their feet reverberated across the canyon.

The sweat was pouring off my face now, the panic rising in my chest. Buster was barking loudly.

"Please!" The woman was struggling to pull herself free. "I'm begging you!"

Oh, God. I couldn't think. Everything was happening too fast.

"I'm calling 911!" I finally shouted.

But to my horror, I realized that I'd left her cell phone on the trail at least a quarter of a mile in the opposite direction.

I had to go back.

I had to get to the phone and call 911 so somebody would come and get her down and haul him off to jail.

But it was too late for that.

Because it was at precisely that moment--when I was feeling hot and scared and sorrier for myself than you can imagine--that a man I didn't know pushed a woman I didn't know off the edge of a mountain.

Her body hit the ground, somewhere out of my sightline, with an obscene thud.


Authour Susan Kandel has a firm grasp of first person witty and off-beat narrative and dialog, so much so that she reminded me of an edgier Elizabeth Peters (in her Vicky Bliss novels, not the Peabody series). The mystery is satisfying, the references to Alfred Hitchcock and his movies enjoyable, and Cece makes an appealing heroine.

Highly recommended.

Manifesto

In this blog, I will write reviews of mystery books.

The mystery books can be in any genre. Most of them will be in the traditional mystery genre, but I will also include books such as the fantasy-noir books featuring freelance sword jockey Eddie Lacrosse, written by Alex Bledsoe.

I will not review any horror-detective books, however. I despise the horror genre, and will not books in the genre.